28 April 2005
19 April 2005
SEO and Google
SEO works for google.
If google can hammer the point that good sites rank higher, that is.
That way google gets better results for a term. This also serves as a self-correcting mechanism. Google is better off getting a lot of good results to choose from, no matter what the motivation behind.
What difference does it make if a good website appears front on google, provides good information to the user, and is optimized. Why discard such a site because it was optmized?
If google can hammer the point that good sites rank higher, that is.
That way google gets better results for a term. This also serves as a self-correcting mechanism. Google is better off getting a lot of good results to choose from, no matter what the motivation behind.
What difference does it make if a good website appears front on google, provides good information to the user, and is optimized. Why discard such a site because it was optmized?
17 April 2005
16 April 2005
Hosting a webpage but not on a server
A resource like wikipedia.org, why can't we store the entire site on different computers based on p2p model.
14 April 2005
Google and facts
Google is finally producing facts. Picking stuff from wikipedia compared to msn's encarta. Google could be the big thing for open source movement.
08 April 2005
07 April 2005
02 April 2005
Bottom Down Analysis
Here is a new, original idea:
Bottom down analysis. A structured approach to identify the bottom-line/herat of the problem/issue. Involves peeling off the semantic layer and understanding the inner workings in their rawest form.
Bottom down analysis. A structured approach to identify the bottom-line/herat of the problem/issue. Involves peeling off the semantic layer and understanding the inner workings in their rawest form.